Bohemian Rhapsody (2018)
Note: I love this film so much. It made me understand Freddie Mercury more, and I appreciated Queen as a whole like I never did before.
When I was a young girl I was very vocal about my views on backmasking, and Queen was one of those I was campaigning against. I still very much believe about the evils of the subliminal messages of backmasking, but I'm glad to see Freddie Mercury, my nephew's favourite singer, and his band, Queen, beyond backmasking(btw, I know a lot of people who used backmasking to insert good subliminal messages too).
This movie has mixed reviews from the critics, most of them would rather have Freddie Mercury as a good for nothing fag (I read somewhere that was what they called him), which was not widely accepted in the 1970s, 1980s, and even the 1990s.
Do I think that the movie was sanitized? Yes, but everything was tackled (drugs, alcohol, homosexuality, bisexuality, temptations, other lurid things, other sordid things), but the movie did not focus on the negative. I mean, it did not dwell on it.
What it did focus on was how Freddie valued his true friends...his family by heart. It also showed that in the end, he also valued his family by blood and by heart too.
The movie was well acted, and exciting too. I don't know what the critics were...are looking for? Do they really want the viewers to see EVERY bad thing Freddie did, just like that female reporter who focused on everything he did in the bedroom, and wherever else he could do "it".
When Queen helped LIVE AID be super successful, I heard he collapsed after the performance, but it wasn't shown in this movie. According to Jim Hutton, his Aids was diagnosed in 1987, a year and a half after the wonderful Live Aid Performance, and not before, but there were speculations about it even before.
Maybe they also wanted to focus on the performance, not the aftermath. After all, he was given by God, yes, I believe that, six years, more or less cinematically, or more than four years in reality, after what the human physicians' given time frame of the end of his mortality.
BTW, since I thought it was going to happen...to be shown in the movie, I was crying already even before the people watching LIVE AID at Wembley were in tears. I also shed some tears in other parts of the movie. When it was just an afterthought, my heart was still wrung. I have so judged this wonderful human being unfairly, in the name of God.
When his lifestyle gave him full blown AIDS, it allowed him to dig deeper in his life, and became a beacon of hope to the hopeless.
Oh, and I also wanna share this reviewer's point of view because I share her sentiments:
Directed by | Bryan Singer and towards the end, Dexter Fletcher |
---|---|
Produced by |
|
Screenplay by | Anthony McCarten |
Story by |
|
This movie has mixed reviews from the critics, most of them would rather have Freddie Mercury as a good for nothing fag (I read somewhere that was what they called him), which was not widely accepted in the 1970s, 1980s, and even the 1990s.
Do I think that the movie was sanitized? Yes, but everything was tackled (drugs, alcohol, homosexuality, bisexuality, temptations, other lurid things, other sordid things), but the movie did not focus on the negative. I mean, it did not dwell on it.
What it did focus on was how Freddie valued his true friends...his family by heart. It also showed that in the end, he also valued his family by blood and by heart too.
The movie was well acted, and exciting too. I don't know what the critics were...are looking for? Do they really want the viewers to see EVERY bad thing Freddie did, just like that female reporter who focused on everything he did in the bedroom, and wherever else he could do "it".
When Queen helped LIVE AID be super successful, I heard he collapsed after the performance, but it wasn't shown in this movie. According to Jim Hutton, his Aids was diagnosed in 1987, a year and a half after the wonderful Live Aid Performance, and not before, but there were speculations about it even before.
Maybe they also wanted to focus on the performance, not the aftermath. After all, he was given by God, yes, I believe that, six years, more or less cinematically, or more than four years in reality, after what the human physicians' given time frame of the end of his mortality.
BTW, since I thought it was going to happen...to be shown in the movie, I was crying already even before the people watching LIVE AID at Wembley were in tears. I also shed some tears in other parts of the movie. When it was just an afterthought, my heart was still wrung. I have so judged this wonderful human being unfairly, in the name of God.
When his lifestyle gave him full blown AIDS, it allowed him to dig deeper in his life, and became a beacon of hope to the hopeless.
Oh, and I also wanna share this reviewer's point of view because I share her sentiments:
Colleen Baron:
2 days ago
- Rami Malek as Freddie Mercury, lead vocalist of the rock band Queen
- Adam Rauf as young Freddie Mercury
- Lucy Boynton as Mary Austin, Mercury's girlfriend and fiancée
- Gwilym Lee as Brian May, Queen lead guitarist
- Ben Hardy as Roger Taylor, Queen drummer
- Joseph "Joe" Mazzello as John Deacon, Queen bass guitarist
- Aidan Gillen as John Reid, Queen's manager
- Tom Hollander as Jim Beach, Queen's lawyer turned manager a.k.a. Miami
- Allen Leech as Paul Prenter, Mercury's personal manager (someone we would love to hate)
- Mike Myers as Ray Foster, an EMI executive
- Aaron McCusker as Jim Hutton, Mercury's love interest
- Dermot Murphy as Bob Geldof
- Meneka Das as Jer Bulsara, Mercury's mother
- Ace Bhatti as Bomi Bulsara, Mercury's father
- Priya Blackburn as Kashmira Bulsara, Mercury's sister
- Dickie Beau as Kenny Everett
- Max Bennett as David, Mary's new boyfriend
- Neil Fox-Roberts as Mr. Austin, Mary's father
- Jack Roth as Tim Staffell, vocalist of the rock band Smile
- Philip Andrew as Reinhold Mack
- Michelle Duncan as Shelley Stern
- Adam Lambert in a cameo role
The Soundtrack
Comments
Post a Comment